GAME RECAP · POSTGAME
Wizards Fall to Raptors 112–102: The Possession Problem Travels to Chicago
Toronto won the offensive glass and made Washington play uphill. Trae Young and Tre Johnson supplied answers, but the Wizards need cleaner possessions and a more useful Anthony Davis night in Chicago.

Washington’s first loss came with an uncomfortable lesson: a competitive score does not mean a team controlled enough of the game. Toronto beat the Wizards 112–102 at Capital One Arena on Friday, dropping Washington to 1–1 before Saturday’s trip to Chicago. The Wizards were within four entering the fourth quarter. They still spent the entire night chasing.
This is a box-score-led WizKids assessment, checked against NBA.com’s final statistics and the game account. The tactical recommendations below are our proposed responses; they are not claims about instructions given inside Washington’s locker room.
HOW THE GAME GOT AWAY
Toronto won the first quarter 34–21 and led 60–52 at halftime. Washington answered with a 25–21 third quarter, entering the fourth down 81–77. That was a real recovery. The problem was that the recovery never became control: Toronto won the last period 31–25, and Washington never led.
The first-quarter deficit matters on the second night of a back-to-back, too. Chicago should not require another long rescue mission. Starting possessions with a clear action, matching up promptly and finishing the first defensive stop are more useful priorities than an emotional promise to “play harder.”
THE NUMBER THAT EXPLAINS THE LOSS: 22 EXTRA SHOTS
Toronto attempted 101 field goals to Washington’s 79. That 22-shot gap is the clearest description of the possession problem. It is not the same thing as saying Toronto had 22 more possessions: free throws, offensive rebounds and turnovers change the relationship between possessions and shot attempts. It does show how often Washington had to defend another attempt without getting an equivalent shot at the other end.
Start with the offensive glass: Toronto collected 19 offensive rebounds to Washington’s six. Scottie Barnes had five, while RJ Barrett and Kawhi Leonard had four apiece. That is not a problem Washington can assign only to its centers. When opposing wings keep arriving for second chances, perimeter players also have to find a body and participate in the rebound.
Then add the giveaways. Washington recorded 20 player turnovers plus three team turnovers, for 23 total. Kyshawn George had eight; Anthony Davis and Trae Young had four each. Toronto had 17 total turnovers. Those are different categories, which is why a player-turnover total of 20 and a team total of 23 can both be correct.
Do not stack those figures into a fake single-number explanation. Offensive rebounds, turnover points and shot attempts overlap. The useful conclusion is simpler: Washington surrendered opportunities at both ends. More made jumpers would help, but they would not repair that process.
THIS WAS NOT A TORONTO THREE-POINT EXPLOSION
The Raptors made seven of 34 threes, only 20.6 percent. Washington made 12 of 37, or 32.4 percent, and scored 30 points at the foul line to Toronto’s 17. The Wizards therefore had a 15-point advantage from made threes and a 13-point advantage at the line. They still lost by 10 because Toronto scored 52 points in the paint to Washington’s 32 and made 44 field goals to Washington’s 30.
The shooting split is a warning against waiting for opponent misses to solve the defense. Toronto already missed plenty from deep. A missed three has to become a secured rebound before Washington can count it as a successful possession.
AD NEEDS A CLEANER WAY INTO THE GAME
Davis followed his 34-point opener with nine points, nine rebounds and two blocks. He shot 3-for-12, had no assists and committed four turnovers. That is a difficult offensive night by any standard. The response should involve Davis and the structure around him, rather than treating another 34-point performance as the team’s default rescue plan.
For Chicago, our preference is an early menu of Young–Davis screening actions, quick rolls and purposeful catches closer to the basket. If help commits, the next pass has to be available immediately. Sarr’s five assists are a reason to explore him as a connector when the defense takes away the direct finish. These are options to test against the Bulls’ actual coverage, not proof that one specific action would have reversed Friday’s result.
Young still delivered 22 points and 12 assists, including four made threes. His four turnovers and 5-for-15 shooting belong in the assessment alongside that creation. The supporting players need easier decisions, but the primary creators also have to protect the possessions they initiate.
KEEP TRE JOHNSON’S SCORING; DEMAND A COMPLETE POSSESSION
Johnson supplied 20 points on 7-for-14 shooting and made four of eight threes. That gave Washington useful scoring on a night when Davis and George combined to shoot 5-for-21. Johnson’s offense should earn purposeful touches: movement into a catch, a second-side action after Young draws attention, and decisions before the defense resets.
The good scoring night does not settle his entire role. His minus-eight is a lineup result, not an individual defensive grade. The same restraint applies to George’s minus-17 or Coulibaly’s minus-20. One game’s plus-minus cannot tell us which player caused every breakdown. Evaluate the coverage, the box-out and the next decision as well as the shot-making.
George’s eight turnovers are the immediate development checkpoint. Simplify his first read, provide a safe outlet and keep him involved without asking every touch to become a difficult creation. Accountability and useful support can happen at the same time.
WHAT TRAVELS TO CHICAGO
The encouraging part was Washington’s ability to get back within reach, Johnson’s efficient scoring and Young’s continued playmaking. The correction is not a wholesale rotation referendum after two games. It is a clearer standard: make a useful first action, remove avoidable turnovers, and have all five players finish the defensive possession.
Saturday’s checklist is measurable. Can the Wizards bring their total turnovers below 15? Can they keep Chicago’s offensive rebounds in single digits? Can Davis get productive early touches without the offense stopping around him? Those are WizKids targets, not guarantees or team-issued goals.
Washington visits the Bulls at United Center on Saturday, October 24, at 8 p.m. ET. Both teams are on the second night of a back-to-back; Chicago just beat Milwaukee 132–125. The next step is a response built on better possessions, not an assumption that the opponent’s name makes the game easier.
MEDIA AND DATA NOTE
Watch the verified NBA full-game highlights embedded above. The NBA.com video link opens the matching first-half highlights package; the final box score is linked in the source footer. Use the Stats Lab’s displayed game count and update timestamp to confirm when the Toronto box score has joined the opener; an earlier daytime refresh does not establish postgame coverage.